Wednesday, January 27, 2010
CUSTOMER (DIS)SATISFACTION AND PRESIDENT OBAMA
2:28 pm pst
I teach marketing
strategy at the Drucker School of Management, a graduate only School that offers MBAs and Executive MBAs. I witnessed first
hand the passion many of my students showed toward Obama, his campaign and his election to President. Many of my students
volunteered during the campaign and participated in the grass roots marketing approach used by Obama’s team.
The day after the election of President
Obama, I recall a heated discussion in one of my classes. I boldly walked into class and asked my students to link the concept
of customer (dis)satisfaction to the election of Obama and tell me what is likely to be the greatest danger Obama faces going
discussion was heated mostly because of the celebratory mood among many of my students and perhaps because of a lack of willingness
to accept that things might not go well for President Obama. After all, irrespective of your personal political affiliation,
there was much to note about the election of President Obama. Aside from the historic significance of his election, as a marketer
I was intrigued by the way in which Obama reached out to the people with the compelling message of hope, used social media
to rally the masses, and urged people to mobilize and make a difference to the future of the United States. As President Obama
stated in the opening lines of his Presidential acceptance speech:
“If there is anyone out there who still doubts that
America is a place where all things are possible; who still wonders if the dream of our founders is alive in our time; who
still questions the power of our democracy, tonight is your answer.”
But to me, the period within which President Obama was elected also
represented a period of great contradiction: on the one hand Obama made people feel hopeful; on the other hand, the speed
and severity with which the recession took hold and a fear of the unknown made people feel hopeless. So, we were left with
an unusual situation in which hopefulness and hopelessness were finding a way to co-exist. (Incidentally,
this is what motivated me to write by book, “Marketing Through Turbulent Times” to address the contradiction between
hopefulness and hopelessness against the backdrop of Obama’s election and the recession and think about what this means
for business leaders and marketers.)
The answer to my question of what could go wrong is linked to the basic principles of customer satisfaction. Put
simply, when there is a gap between expectations and delivery, people are dissatisfied. To minimize dissatisfaction means
to close the gap by either lowering peoples’ expectations or improving delivery.
Without even taking into account specific
changes President Obama has made or is trying to make, the expectations placed on Obama were colossal. To illustrate, here
are some quotes from the media at the time Obama was elected, …“[although Obama] must tackle two wars,
a calamitous recession and the unexpected … [y]et by a three-to-one majority, American’s are more optimistic
with him in charge” (The Economist, January 24, 2009, p. 34). Or in a poll published in
Newsweek on January 26, 2009 (p. 43), 66% said they were very/somewhat optimistic that the new administration would
be able to improve the way things are going in the country and 71% were confident Obama would successfully turn the economy
so much hope placed on what President Obama can achieve during his term as President, the chance of Obama living up
to expectations will always be slim. The lessons of marketing apply to Obama just as they do to Procter
& Gamble, Exxon Mobil, Mattel or Apple – if the goal is to get people to remain loyal, repurchase (i.e., vote again)
and be advocates for your brand by recommending the brand to friends, then the perceived gap between expectations and delivery
needs to be closed.
Darroch is on the faculty at the Drucker School at Claremont Graduate University. She is an expert on marketing strategies
that generate growth. See www.MarketingThroughTurbulentTimes.com
Key words: President Obama, customer
satisfaction, customer dissatisfaction, brand management, political marketing, hope, expectations, delivery, marketing in
Monday, January 18, 2010
MARKETERS, ARE YOU LISTENING TO THE LANGUAGE USED TO DESCRIBE THE NEW APPLE TABLET?
7:53 am pst
There aren’t many companies around that practice marketing
the way that Apple does. I call Apple’s approach to marketing “Heretical Marketing” because
Apple clearly departs from accepted beliefs or practices when they develop and launch new products. Here’s
Central to marketing is the goal of identifying
customer needs and wants, such as problems consumers have with existing products, and then developing solutions to satisfy
One of the problems that plagues
marketing is its limited success in coming up with ideas that will result in the development of a disruptive innovation.
The problem is that when we go to the market to identify customer needs and wants, people will respond in terms of
the mental models they hold of the market. What this means is that when people respond to marketing research, most will do
so in terms of the product attributes they are familiar with based on what they know about products currently available on
the market. It is difficult, if not impossible, for respondents to suggest solutions for problems they didn’t know they
had or evaluate something that is beyond their comprehension.
Why then did I call Apple a bunch of “Heretical Marketers”? Because, what Apple has become well
known for is first developing a solution (a new product) and then building demand for the new product by telling consumers
about the needs and wants the new product solves. As Kim of Mac Rumors said when asked about the rumored Apple Tablet, “People
hold out hope that Apple will surprise them and make a device they didn’t even know they wanted” (The Los Angeles
Times, December 31, 2009).
Other things we read
about Apple simply demonstrate good practice: a strong brand we trust to deliver something reliable, exciting and innovative,
an organization that manages to build hype and gets free publicity along the way, and an organization that is confident enough
in its own ability that it lets the product find its own feet in the market. As Daniel Lyons wrote recently
in Newsweek (Jan 5 2010), “…the cool thing about technology is that no one ever knows how new ideas will evolve.
… The lesson we’ve learned since then is that even the people who created the iPhone could not have imagined
what people would do with the device.”
we know that Apple has been successful not just in monetary terms but in marketing terms because as a consequence of buying
the iPod or iPhone, consumer behavior has substantially altered. There aren’t that many products
around that can be attributed with creating categories, forming new reference points for consumers and underscoring cultural
I liked the title of Lyons’ article:
“The Tablet will be what we make of it” because we can’t comprehend the attributes the Tablet will embody,
nor do we know who will first adopt the Tablet and what these early adopters will use the Tablet for. And of course, we don’t
know how the Tablet will evolve once it hits the market. It will be interesting to look back in a couple of years and see
just how much impact the Tablet has had on consumer behavior.
Jenny Darroch is on the faculty at the Drucker School at Claremont Graduate University.
She is an expert on marketing strategies that generate growth. See www.MarketingThroughTurbulentTimes.co
Key words: Marketing strategies, new product development, innovation, technology,
Apple iPod, Apple Table, Apple iPhone, consumer behavior, marketing research, cultural shifts
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
SUPER BOWL ADVERTISING: 2009 VS. 2010
4:56 pm pst
Super Bowl time is
almost upon us and once again the question of whether companies should spend money on Super Bowl commercials has arisen.
Last year, circumstances were quite different. For example,
Monday January 26, 2009 was labeled Black Monday because it was the day that many large corporations announced fourth quarter
results for 2008 and, predictably, the results were not good. In one day, Home Depot announced it would lay off 7,000 employees,
Sprint 8,000, Caterpillar a further 5,000 (for a total of 20,000), Pfizer announced it would buy Wyeth and lay off 10% of
the workforce or about 5,000 people, and ING cut 7,000 positions. In total, 71,400 jobs were shed on Monday January 26 2009,
making a total of over 200,000 jobs in the first few weeks of 2009 – not to mention the 2.6 million jobs lost in 2008,
the most jobs lost in one year since the end of World War II. And of course, job losses continued and unemployment is now
hindering a quick economic recovery.
whether or not to advertise during the 2009 Super Bowl provides great insights into the dilemma many marketers were facing
at the time. Since a 30 second Super Bowl commercial costs $3m (or $100,000 per second!), the cost was hard to justify when
so many people were either being laid off or fearful of being laid off. Then there were questions of advertising
effectiveness. As Bruce Horowitz noted in the USA Today (January 30, 2009), prior evidence suggests a direct relationship
between consumer confidence and advertising recall – when consumer confidence is low, advertising recall is also low.
Then there is the issue as to the appropriate message to use in a Super Bowl commercial. Is the Super Bowl a time to bring
a “moment of joy” to consumers as Pepsi did? Or is the Super Bowl a time to show the company is still around,
as Audi did? Or is the Super Bowl best avoided because advertising on the Super Bowl sends the wrong message to employees
and constituents, which is why FedEx decided not to advertise during the Super Bowl of 2009 (Horowitz, 2009). As Steve Hayden,
the Vice Chairman at Ogilvy Worldwide said, “This is the first Super Bowl of the Great Depression 2.0.”
But the dark days seem to be over and the Super Bowl is
just a few weeks away. Let’s hope Super Bowl marks a return to good old-fashioned brand building, something that was
lost through the recession.
Jenny Darroch is on the faculty at the Drucker School at Claremont Graduate University. She
is an expert on marketing strategies that generate growth. See www.MarketingThroughTurbulentTimes.com
Key Words: Super Bowl, Super Bowl Ads, Marketing in a Recession,
Marketing Strategies, Advertising Effectiveness, Unemployment, Recession, Job Losses, Black Monday